The Ministry of Health’s new hospital admission criteria: will patients have timely access to hospital care?
The draft was published by the Ministry of Health, and has been publicly criticised by infectious disease specialist Olga Golubovska and the Ukrainian Medical Association.
The Ministry of Health explains that the new standard is intended to establish uniform approaches to decisions regarding the hospitalisation of patients in healthcare facilities of all forms of ownership that provide inpatient care. The document outlines criteria for planned and emergency hospitalisation, subsequent inpatient stays, patient transfers and discharges. Emergency hospitalisation, as stated in the draft, does not require prior agreement on the date and time.
At the same time, the text of the draft itself contains a provision stating that deviation from the admission criteria is permitted only in exceptional cases where there are documented clinical grounds or a decision by a medical consultation. It is precisely this provision that has become one of the main points of criticism: opponents of the document believe that in practice it could make doctors overly dependent on formal frameworks.
Olga Golubovska stated that the draft effectively seeks to impose strict financial discipline on the healthcare sector, but at the expense of patient safety. In her view, as a regulatory act, the standard will be binding, and therefore cannot simultaneously be described as ‘recommended criteria’. She also criticises the strict thresholds for hospitalisation, particularly levels of oxygen saturation, blood pressure and respiratory rate, as, in her view, such parameters only indicate a condition that is already severe, rather than allowing for a timely response to the risk of deterioration.
Separately, the doctor drew attention to categories of patients whom, in her view, the document does not take sufficiently into account. These include elderly people living alone, patients with flu living in cramped conditions, and those suffering from pneumonia, acute intestinal infections and urinary tract infections. Her position is that in such cases, outpatient treatment may prove dangerous if the doctor is forced to rely primarily on a formal standard rather than on the prognosis of the disease’s course.
The Ukrainian Medical Association has also published a similar assessment. The organisation stated that the draft in its proposed form cannot be supported, and published its own comments to the Ministry of Health. They also emphasise that the document could alter the balance of responsibility between the doctor, the patient and the regulatory system, and not in favour of clinical flexibility.
Consequently, a conflict has already arisen between two opposing approaches regarding the Ministry of Health’s new draft. On the one hand, the ministry is attempting to standardise the rules for hospital admission and discharge. On the other, doctors warn that excessively strict regulations could undermine the timeliness of care, particularly for patients at risk of rapid deterioration. The final outcome will now depend on how seriously the Ministry of Health is prepared to revise the document following the discussion.
Recall: Medicine with a ‘sales plan’: how Natalia Karamelyeva transformed a municipal medical centre into a private clinic
